Saturday, October 31, 2009
Cooking a frog....
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Houston.....We have a problem.....
First, the whole family went to see an auction today in Cremorne. Price guidance/expectation was $1.65M+. Open bid was $1.8. It was eventually sold for $1.98M. 5 active bidders slugged it out. The house is quite old and probably need some work and is located on a main road. However, if you build a second floor, you can probably see the CBD from the second floor. Land is big for the area (over 700 sqm). The house next door was for sale last year and only "got" a vendor bid of $1.8M.
Second, a friend went to an auction in Chatswood last week. A few months ago, a similar house on the street was sold for $1.2M. The house last week was in far better condition. Open bid was $1.2M. Second bid was $1.4M. Third bid was $1.6M. Needless to say, it was over quickly.
It would not surprise me if prices are now higher than the peak in some cases. Thinking back what went "wrong"....Suspect the key supporting factor behind the LNS property market has been the lack of supply. Other factors have also contributed to the "happy" market. The first home buyer grant has allowed lots of property owners to trade up. The rapid recovery for the local investment banks does not hurt. Low interest rate definitely improves affordability for most folks. The list goes on and on and on....
What is our plan ? Looks like it is time for Plan B. We have given up on the LNS property dream. Supply so far is not picking up there. We are now looking further north. Sad to report but it is not getting any easier. Same story...Crowds everywhere. The good news is supply is picking up in the area but prices are comparable (if not higher) than even LNS if the houses are close to station and on the East side.
My strategy is simple. We have a set budget. We are only prepared to pay that price. If we like a place, we would just offer what we think the house is worth (subject to that upper limit) and see if it sticks. So far, no luck. I figure this is a compromise of sort. If successful, I suspect while we would be over paying relative to other alternative investment opportunities out there, at least we protect ourself from future financial distress. If not successful, suspect my next blog title would be "Houston....We have a BIG problem.....".
Turning to the stock market, tricky times. Looks like consensus is the world is on the mend. Just look at the strength of the AUD. Stocks have rallied globally. Seemingly, a lot of folks are so far refusing to believe and have not adjusted their asset allocation accordingly. While it is hard to believe, the proverbial "money on the sideline" may still apply. My scenario and my time horizon are very short term now. Maybe there will be a short term correction and then if all stars are aligned stocks may melt up towards the end of the year. I really don't have a clue what 2010 will look like.
In the meantime, if you are a distressed buyer like us, keep your fingers crossed and pray for more houses to come on the market. We really don't want to have to shift our property aspiration to include the Central Coast area....
Sunday, August 16, 2009
Radioactive zone
Officially, I hate to say it but we are rolling over to a limited degree. We are looking to buy a property seriously now. The decision was sparked by a lunch with an ex-colleague. He told me the Sydney property market had all the reasons to tank but it held together. While the world is still not well at its core, the next downturn may take some time to brew. And Number 2 is growing every day......We do need to buy our house at some point.
We actually submitted bids on 2 properties in the past 1-2 months. Needless to say, we missed out on both properties. A bit sorry to miss out on the first one but the other buyers were just willing to pay more. The property ended up going for 15% more than our bid. So fair game. We threw in the towel to participate in the great property game but at least we did not throw caution to the wind.
The second property was a more interesting story. For those who have been looking at the LNS, it is somewhat odd that there is this part of Greenwich that seemingly is very cheap. A reasonable house in that part of Greenwich (4-5 bedrooms + decent land) can be bought in the low to mid 1 range. The catch is it is quite close to a broadcast tower along the Pacific Highway. We put in a bid and thought maybe the broadcast tower is not such a big deal. Luckily, a friend told me to search on the web to see what I could dig up. After I saw a study specific about that issue in that area, we decided to pull our bid. I am not a scientist but, with our two little kids, we just did not want to risk it. Just before we called the agent, the agent called us and told us that the vendor was not prepared to sell at our price so we had a relatively graceful exit.
Talking about the agent......I just have to vent. The agent for that Greenwich house was a total jacka@@. Arrogant to boot. He is an out of area agent. One of the big agencies. We all know the tune..."Thank you Mr %$#@er". Instead, I would say something else less thankful to Mr %$#@er if I ever see him again. By the way, he operates in the Northbridge area. When my Better Half told him that we were not prepared to raise our price. He asked was it because we just could not afford to in a condescending manner.... I know how hard we have to work to save what meagre sum we have. Admittedly, he saw our bomb of a car when we went and saw the property the first time. He was just plain RUDE. Seriously, what real economic function does a real estate agent serve ? For God's sake, the vendors even pay for their marketing campaigns. I guess this is how a capitalist society works. The "Haves" get to laugh at the "Have-Nots".
Guess my strategy going forward is to put in bids for properties that we like. I figure, with our budget, for a property that ticks all the boxes, we are not really over-paying by that much. We will see.
Saturday, July 25, 2009
Place your bet
The property market ? It is winter. Not a lot of new listings. Prices are holding up. What is there to tell ? The only good news is some houses (seemingly asking too much in my opinion) remain unsold.
Sunday, July 19, 2009
Watching paint dry
Turning to the stock market, same story....The US market has gone back from the edge of the abyss and is looking to challenge the recent high. The so called "head and shoulder" topping action has been averted. We will see how sustainable is it. Volume on the decline and the recent surge has been quite dismal. Suspect we are still in the middle of no where despite more confidence about the global economy pulling out of this mess relatively soon. Now there is this emerging idea that we are looking at a "square root" recovery. What will happen next year is NOW the BIG question ?
How does one cope in this environment ? One common mistake people make is they think they have to act all the time. Sometimes it makes a lot of sense to just stand on the sideline and observe. My philosophy with investing is one can make very good investments during crisis. It is almost guaranteed that something will go amiss over the next 4-6 years. The period in between is more about maintenance and protecting capital. Maybe now is such a time....
Sunday, July 12, 2009
An interesting trade
One suspects the stock market is far more interesting right now. The big bet is will the world recover next year ? Basically, I suspect no one has a clue.
One interesting trade idea is to go long volatility in USA. The VIX index has come down from the high. Think it was 60-70 at its peak and has since declined to around 25-30. For a long time before the current mess, volatility was hovering around 20 for quite some time.
I suspect going long the VIX index is not such a silly idea. Or maybe think about ETF like VXX. If you tell me the world is the same as 5 years ago, I suspect you are not going to be TOO right in the future. The world is on the cusp of a lot of changes (inflation or deflation, the start of the secular demise of USA/USD, is the miracle of China/Australia a mirage etc etc...). I don't know anyone who will get all these changes right. But what I know is a lot of people are going to be wrong at some point on one of these big upcoming changes. A little protection is not such a bad idea.
Sunday, July 5, 2009
Serendipity
I must say I am feeling quite fishy about the stock market these days. Be careful out there. If green shoots don't grow into something else, it is going to hurt. I find it amusing that everyone is now counting on China to crarry us through this mess. The little problem is, even if we assume China can run its own race, China only accounts for some 40-50% of certain commodity demand. I had lunch with some of my friends last week. One of them is a management consultant. One of them is a tax hotshot in a large firm. They told me that internally they are all planning for a slow 2H. Btw do you notice that everyone now expects the stock market to stay above its recent low ? We may have a bit of a dip and then resume the ascent. It feels a bit too neat for me. If we assume the market is always wrong, maybe there are two distinct outcomes that will totally surprise all folks. First, a raging bull market. Second, we tank below the recent low.
Can the property market do its own thing ? We made our FIRST ever offer 2 weeks ago. We came across this property totally unexpectedly. We went to lunch in this new restaurant. We haven't looked at this suburb before. It is a bit further from the City but manageable. Anyway, after spending years looking at the Lower North Shore area, everything else outside stacks up well (big land, big house etc etc...). When we heard the price guidance from the agent. We thought it seemed low so we put in an a bid. Subsequently, the agent found another interested party. It went to auction which we did not attend. A third party came in and won. We missed the final price a fair bit. So a "good" loss I guess. Still, it is quite interesting to me that only 3 parties were interested in that property. Everyone knows this is a tight market in terms of supply, what happens if we get more houses coming onto the market ? Despite all signs of life in the property market, I still suspect we are not out of the wood yet.
Sunday, June 14, 2009
Cold Turkey
Monday, June 8, 2009
Green Shoot = Green Tree ?
Sunday, May 31, 2009
Square Rooted
Monday, May 25, 2009
The best thing since sliced bread....
Saturday, May 16, 2009
Oh what joy !!!
Saturday, May 9, 2009
Boring....
Sunday, May 3, 2009
The new paradigm
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Make it counts
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Time to hop on ?
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Sub-prime in Oz
Saturday, April 4, 2009
Head Fake
MOSMAN HOUSES
- 2009 – 24 sales. Averaging 8 sales per month with a median sale price of $1,425,000
- 2008 – 264 sales. Averaging 22 sales per month with a median sale price of $2,200,000
- 2007 – 409 sales. Averaging 34 sales per month with a median sale price of $2,230,000
- 2006 – 396 sales. Averaging 33 sales per month with a median sale price of $1,900,000
- 2005 – 293 sales. Averaging 24 sales per month with a median sale price of $1,850,000
- 2004 – 310 sales. Averaging 26 sales per month with a median sale price of $1,637,500
- 2003 – 376 sales. Averaging 31 sales per month with a median sale price of $1,699,500
- 2002 – 392 sales. Averaging 33 sales per month with a median sale price of $1,690,000
- 2001 – 446 sales. Averaging 37 sales per month with a median sale price of $1,250,000
- 2000 - 349 sales. Averaging 29 sales per month with a median sale price of $1,150,000
Source: RP Data
Friday, March 27, 2009
Latest stat
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Rambo in 2009
Sunday, March 1, 2009
Rome is burning....
Saturday, February 28, 2009
There are no distressed sellers only distressed buyers
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Two more interesting examples
Friday, February 20, 2009
Is this really happening ?
Clearance rates in the east and lower North Shore are down on the same time last year.
There have been 400 auctions so far this month, the lightest February volume since 2004.
February sales have averaged $563,000. The cheapest was a Willoughby studio mortgagee sale netting $142,000.
Last Saturday agents secured the sale of 66 per cent of their 164 listings. The dearest sale was that of a $1.83 million six-bedroom Strathfield house with a new swimming pool. It last sold for $1.77 million in 2003 and potential buyers were advised during its initial January marketing to expect above $1.5 million.
It is all happening.....
Saturday, February 14, 2009
Shouting from the rooftop
Thursday, February 5, 2009
What is going on ?
Sunday, February 1, 2009
Two markers out there.....
Sunday, January 25, 2009
What would you do if you were a buyer ?
Saturday, January 24, 2009
An expat spotted in Balmoral
Looks like it will take until 2010...
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
A new tactic by the agents ?
Monday, January 19, 2009
A few anecdotes
Here is an objective look at the current mess
Sunday, January 18, 2009
Do you deserve to make money ?
Saturday, January 17, 2009
The emu effect
Friday, January 16, 2009
Are you a hedge fund ?
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
So far NO good
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Investment psychology
Yet, it is the exact opposite when it comes to the Sydney property market. It is one of the most popular "trades" or "investments" out there. Today, I saw this blog on Domain. The MD of a major real estate agent argues that, because stock markets have collapsed everywhere, the property market should perform that little bit better as funds get diverted into properties in Australia.
How strange indeed !!! In fact, the correct response (when it comes to making money) is to allocate more funds into the asset class that has fallen. It is the harder decision (in terms of the usual feel good factors) but it is the right decision. How much upside is there from an asset class that hasn't fallen much at all (vs. stocks that have fallen by over 50% in some cases) ?
By the way, don't forget that properties are illiquid assets. Normally, illiquidity translates into discount on the asset. In contrast, Sydney properties are priced at significant premium.
I have another dilemma.......Instead of buying a property and earn 4-5% yield, in some extreme cases, I can buy small stocks trading at 1-4X PE (growing and balance sheet is bullet proof i.e. market cap = cash on hand). As long as these companies are not fraudulent, I figure I stand to make more money buying these stocks long term vs. buying a house in Sydney.
The Sydney property market doesn't feel rational at all.
Saturday, January 10, 2009
Black Swan
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
There is nothing logical when it comes to house prices !!
Monday, January 5, 2009
Is this sensible ? Risk management in buying a property ?
I saw this blog from a buyers agent (published in Nov 08):
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I am working with some clients at the moment that were initially looking to sell their current home and upgrade to a larger home to match their growing family. They didn't have not had any luck selling their home (at the price they felt it was worth) so were feeling dismayed about not being able to move in to a larger home.
With the drop in interest rates and taking in to account what they could rent their current home for in the current market, it turned out they are able to buy the larger new home and still hold the current home. They are now really excited at the prospect of bing able to buy a great home that they couldn't have afforded before due to its price coming down and holding their current property to sell in a few years time when the market picks up.
They did their sums and are turning the current financial doom and gloom in to an opportunity.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The blog is especially interesting because it brings into focus a key bull argument for the property market i.e. falling interest rate. It also brings into focus that the property market may be stalling a bit for some sellers. The blog got me thinking....Would I follow this strategy ?
The answer is NO personally but a lot depends on your risk tolerance. First, let's see why it is a good idea. The ONE reason why you would want to follow the strategy is if you strongly believe in the property market i.e. it will go up and up and up. In that case, the rent pays for your holding cost and, if you are truly astute (your property is positive yielding), your tenant will help you to pay down your mortgage as well. In short, you are strongly increasing your leverage.
However, leverage cuts both ways (up or down). It brings me to the key idea of this post. I remember in the years past when I was snoring in the lecture hall in the back row, a finance professor said again and again one of the core tenants of risk management is matching the duration of assets and liabilities. Incidentally, I suspect this is also the reason why some of the high profile investment banks got unstuck recently.
Applying the concept to the Sydney property market, I would argue that some folks have probably taken on a lot of risks without aware of it. In the simplest term, a bank will foreclose a property if interest payment is not being made. In most cases, the interest payments are funded by the wages of the household. We also know that most people do change jobs every few years. Thus, we can probably assert that there is cash flow uncertainty (bonus may change/disappear, two income household becoming single income etc etc...) for every household. In contrast, a 30-year mortgage is a very long term liability with minimal flexibility. This is a case of pretty bad asset/liability mismatch.
So far, this mismatch has caused minimal problems for the society and households (very vibrant economy and ever increasing house prices). Still, do bear in mind that good times do not last forever.
Now imagine if you are the home owner advised by the buyers agent. Let's say you have a comfortable 3 bedroom house worth $1.2M. And you are looking to upgrade to a $2M 4 bedroom house in Mosman. Let's say you have paid off a reasonable chunk of your mortgage and you only owe $600000 in your own home and have another $400000 saved in the bank/shares. If you could sell your home, you would only need to borrow another $400000. You can still be quite comfortable because you would have 50% capital in your new $2M mortgage. Let's say you follow the strategy of the buyers agent, you still owe $600000 in your original house and then you take on another $2M in mortgage (or $1.6M assuming you have saved another $400000 somewhere). Suddenly, you find yourself with total debts of $2.2M. Imagine one day you find out you are having another kid or maybe your tenant has lost his/her job ?
Food for thought.
Saturday, January 3, 2009
Is it conceivable that the Sydney property market may fall 30% ?
THE home of a Sydney property developer in one of the country's most prized streets has sold at mortgagee auction for $4.1 million.
This is a 40 per cent discount on the original asking price of about $7 million
Avi Hershco's three-apartment property in exclusive Bellevue Hill was sold to an eastern suburbs buyer on Tuesday night, in a further sign of problems besetting Australia's top surburbs.
He had handed over the property to the bank, along with his development of six luxury residential units in Beresford Road, Rose Bay.
Mr Hershco said he had planned to rip down the three apartments on the Kambala Road site, where he lives, to build a home. But those hopes were dashed when Suncorp Metway called in loans on his properties.
"I am not bankrupt, but the bank wants the money and they are also under financial stress," Mr Hershco said.
"Suncorp Metway pulled the plug a month ago."
In March, Mr Hershco said, he had an offer of about $7million for the Kambala Road block, but it collapsed at the last minute.
He bought the Kambala Road site for $4.3million in 2005. The site has three multi-storey apartments, one of which he lives in, as well as some land and a tennis court. It went to mortgagee auction in Double Bay on Tuesday.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Below is the link to the property:
http://www.realestate.com.au/realestate/nsw/eastern+suburbs/105352179
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Now imagine how much your dream house would cost in 2008 if it goes back to the 2005 price level ?
What is wrong with this picture ?
In my personal experience, $2M is seen as "pocket change" these days. The Mosman real estate agents remind me of this one famous quote from the super model Naomi Campbell.
I am sure there are many more successful and intelligent people out there than yours truly. But sometimes I wonder how much leverage would someone take on in order to enter the pearly heavenly gate of Mosman ?
A disclosure here....I am working on anecdotes here. I was told 2 stories about the property market in the Eastern Suburbs 2 months ago. Bankers (about my age...early to mid 30s) put down a deposit of $500000 to buy houses worth $3-4M. A couple (both law firm partners) put down a deposit of $500000 to buy a house worth $5M.
Imagine if you are the banker here. Your mortgage rate is say 6% and you have borrowed $2.5M. Your base salary is $300000. Your interest payment alone should be close to $150000 a year. We all know what is the top marginal tax rate is and we can work out that there is not a lot of the base salary left after paying the interest, let's alone repaying the capital. Thus, to afford a comfortable lifestyle, you, the banker, needs to count on healthy yearly bonuses in years to come.
To make it more interesting, let's assume you, the banker, have 2-3 kids. Or you wouldn't need a 4/5 bedroom house. It is no secret that it costs more than $20000 p.a. to send a kid to a reputable private school these days. Hmmm I hope you, the banker, are married to another hard charging banker/lawyer/business executive.
Now if we turn to the second example, we know that a junior law firm partner probably makes $4-500000 a year. A more senior partner easily makes over $1M a year. Needless to say, a household income of $2M can easily work down a $4.5M mortgage. But it gets more interesting if the household income is only $1M. Interest payment alone on a $4.5M mortgage adds up to $270000. Still a fairly comfortable situation but the quesiton is how long would it take to pay off the mortgage entirely ?
My point is margin for error is low in both scenarios. If I have to take out a 30-year mortgage, by definition, I will be working until I am 65. Doesn't strike me as especially fun. But I must be old fashion. Apparently, 30-year mortgage is the norm these days.....